The Allegation by RAFFWU

News article 1 – Underpayments of Woolworths

The Retail and Fast Food Workers Union (RAFFWU) alleged that vast amount of workers in Woolworths are earning lesser under the existing agreement followed by the organization. Patty (2018) stated in a report that the application of an expired 2012 national enterprise agreement in the Woolworths’ structure affected the payrolls that were provided to the employees. The union estimated that the underpayment that was undertaken by Woolworths amounted to $1 billion. The change in the agreement that was undertaken by the organization affected the interests of the employees largely through lack of proper payment of wages.

 The problem with the agreement was related to its incapability of considering working hours on evenings and weekends. It affected the daily wage rate of the employees thereby deducting the deserving amount from their payrolls. It affected the interests and the livelihood of the employees largely. The Fair Work Commission has undertaken steps to investigate into the matter and thereby identify the major flaws in the organization structure, which affected the functioning of the same as per the expectations of the employees.  The concerned situation affected the employee relations with the management of Woolworths through maximization of the staff turnover ratio. On the other hand, Patty  (2018) stated that discontent among the workforce results to degradation of productivity, which affected the smooth functioning of the business processes as was planned by the same.  The old agreement that was followed  by the organization negated the extra working hours that were used by the employees. It affected the payroll systems of the business through payment cuts. Therefore, Loukas Kakogiannis, the store supervisor applied to the Fair Work Commission for terminating the agreement that was followed by the business. On the other hand, The Retail and Fast Food Workers Union (RAFFWU) supported the petition of Loukas in this aspect for terminating the agreement for enhancing employee relations of the business (Patty, 2018).

The different aspects of change in the organizational functioning will be based on the assessment of its impact on the workforce, as the active participation of the employees in the processes that are planned by the enterprise is important for the smooth functioning of the same. Da Costa et al., (2012) stated that the identification of the needs of the employees will be helping the business in enumerating the different changes in order to hold suitable employee relations. As per the case, the management board of Woolworths must take steps to review the situation that is faced by the employees in order to bring forth modifications in the agreement. The union members aimed at negotiating with the Fair Work Commission in order to bring forth improvements in the situations and thereby avoid discrepancies in the payroll systems of the same. The concerned organization proposed a new enterprise agreement in place of the former that was utilized by the same. The new agreement would be safeguarding the payrolls, bring forth improvements in the penalty rates and payment rises for the employees. Marginson  (2015) stated that the reformed agreement of the organization will be helping the same in facilitating the interests of the employees and thereby enhance the employee relation for better outputs.

The Problem with the Agreement

The Fair Work Commission investigated and found that some 77,000 Coles workers encountered similar underpayments due to the agreement that was signed by the organization, which was similar to the agreement that was followed by Woolworths. Toscano and Schneiders  (2018) stated in the report that the key changes that were undertaken by the organizations were based on the agreements that were followed by the same while operating in diverse economic markets. The lack of proper communication with the employees affected the proper functioning of the business operations. On the other hand, the organizations, Woolworths and Coles should have reviewed the agreement and thereby made the employees aware of the working schedules that would be reflected in their payroll systems. It would have helped the organizations in minimizing the risks relating to an ill employee relation. According to the company’s spokesperson, the management and the other respective councils are undertaking negotiations with the unions in order to terminate the old agreement and thereby support the existence of a new agreement at its place (Toscano & Schneiders,  2018). Communicational patterns and the negotiations that are undertaken by organizations has helped the same in understanding the situation more dynamically and thereby bring forth changes in the operations.

The functioning of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) is based on the assimilation of interests of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission and the Australian Industrial registry in order to support Australian Fair Pay Commission. The steady operations and investigations that were undertaken by the FWC have helped in unraveling the truth behind all the discrepancies that are faced by the employees while operating in diverse economies. Toscano and Schneiders  (2018) stated that the case of Woolworths has affected the employee relations of the organization with its workforce. The dissatisfaction of the employees were based on the underpayments that were made to them for the overtimes that were served by the same as per the norms of the organization. On the other hand, the employees had little knowledge of the agreement that was held by the organization with the unions. It has largely affected the goodwill and the productivity of the same due to the lack of proper negotiation undertaken by the organization with the respective labor unions. Cullinane et al.,  (2014) stated that the Fairfax Media investigated and revealed that the Woolworths, McDonald’s and Coles were their workers below the proposition due to their private dealings with the union. It has affected the employee relations of the businesses and thereby affected the productivity of the same while operating in diverse economies. Employee satisfaction plays a major role in the smooth functioning of businesses. However, the strategies that were undertaken by the organizations have affected the employee satisfaction and trust on their employers. Townsend,  Wilkinson and Burgess (2014) stated that the Fair Work Commission has ordered the organizations to fix the issues through paying off the underpaid amounts to the employees in order to maintain the smooth operations of businesses.  Therefore, the propositions that were made by Woolworths and Coles are required to be delivered along with the termination of the old agreement over the formation of a new in order to enhance the payroll of the employees. It will be helping the organizations in holding a strong employee relationship for enhancing the operations.   

Effect on Employee Relations and Staff Turnover

Strong employee relation helps organizations in undertaking different aspects of change in the operation of the same. Compliance with the Fair Work Act (2009) has helped employers in understanding the requirements of the employees and thereby undertake steps to amend the same. Different modifications in the amendments that are proposed by the organizations are dependent on the employer’s negotiations with the trade unions. Gill and Meyer  (2013) stated that the major issues that affects the sustainable employee relation are based on the parameters of the wages, attendance disputes, workplace safety and conflict management in the organization. The modifications that are undertaken by organizational management depends on the identification of the issues that are faced  by the employees and thereby mitigate the same through continuous negotiations and bargaining. Townsend,  Wilkinson and Burgess (2014) stated that the  management of organizations undertake negotiations with the workforce in order to enhance the operations without compromising the productivity. However, Da Costa et al., (2012) stated that the negotiations that are planned by businesses helps the same un undertaking radical modifications in the structure and processes which assists in achieving its sustenance while operating in diverse economies.

The enumeration of the Fair Work Act and the implementation of the same in the organizational structure have helped organizations in maintaining the efficacy of the operations through employee satisfaction and retention. Workplace bargaining has provided organizations with the scope of understanding the different needs of the employees. It also helps organizations in assessing the capabilities of the organization to deliver the amendments in order to maintain smooth functioning. Marginson  (2015) noted that dissatisfaction of the employees due to the policies that are framed organizations affects the suitable functioning of the businesses. On the other hand,  Larsen and  Navrbjerg  (2015) stated that the dissatisfaction of the employees also results to high staff turnover rates in organizations. Workplace bargaining thereby helps managements in establishing sound relations with the employees through collaborative functioning. The changes that are planned by businesses help in maintaining the efficacy of the functions while operating in the diverse economies. Workplace negotiations help the organizational management in facilitating modifications through change readiness among the employees and mitigating the forces of resistance among the workforce.

Yang et al.,  (2013) stated that the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), established different steps to negotiate with the employers for restoring workers rights. On the other hand, Gollan and Patmore  (2013) stated that ACTU aims at stabilizing the employee and employer relations in order to bring forth positive growth in the industries through the enumeration of different measures  for enhancing the working conditions  resulting to profitability of businesses. The key changes in the frameworks are based on the enhancement of the employees and employer relations. Lucero,   Allenand and  Elzweig  (2013) stated that collective bargaining of the trade unions with the employers of an industry helps in reassuring the rights of employees relating to workplace safety, wages, attendance and conflict management among the workforce. Cullinane et al.,  (2014) stated that the smooth functioning of organizations contributes significantly towards the appropriate functioning of business operations through empowering the employees. Greater levels of satisfaction among the employees of organizations help the same in undertaking the smooth functioning of the same while operating as per the objectives of business enterprises.  Caraway,   Rickard and  Anner  (2012) stated that the induction of different cultures in the workplace is the resultant of dyadic negotiation among the labor unions and the organizational management. Bova  (2013) stated that the Trader’s association undertakes different negotiations with the labor unions based on payrolls and the other needs of the employees in order to facilitate the smooth functioning of business organizations. Stewart et al.,  (2014) stated that the key changes that are planned by organizational management is based on the identification of the long term effects of the same and the manner in which the employees might react to the modifications. However, discrepancies occur due to the differences in the interests of organizations and employees based on profitability and better working conditions respectively. Layton,  Smithand  Stewart (2013) noted that differences in the perceptions of the organizational management and the employees affect the changes that are planned by businesses. Negotiations that are undertaken by the collective bodies help in mitigating the discrepancies in order to enhance the operations of the same while operating as per the objectives of businesses. Fujimoto,   Azmat and  Härtel  (2013) stated that the collective bodies of traders and labors identifies the issues that are faced by the people relating to the operations that are planned by businesses. The issues that are faced by the organizations due to lack of proper negotiation with its employees is related to the minimization of the productivity. According to Naughton  (2012) resistances that are created by the employees during the change process might affect the organizational operations relating to the degrading productivity of same.

Investigation by Fair Work Commission

The issues that are faced by organizations due to lack of suitable means of communication and negotiations with the employees are essentially conflict management and wage and attendance discrepancies. Donaghey et al.,  (2012) stated that the  policies that are created by the HR departments of organizations affect the workplace culture. Therefore, the HR of organizations must take proactive steps to make the employees aware of the different changes that might be applied on the organizational processes. On the other hand, Gollan and Lewin (2013) noted that the resistances that are forwarded by the employees while operating in the specific processes designed by the HR is mitigated through the utilization of different negotiation procedures. The HR might undertake sessions with the employees in order to settle matters relating to payroll extensions and leaves in order to facilitate the smooth functioning of the businesses. Mitigation of the issues that are faced by the employees through diverse range of strategies will be helping businesses in maintaining the efficacy of the functions in order to ensure the continuous productivity.  Schulten and Brandt  (2012) stated that suitable implementation of workplace bargaining helps the businesses in inducing the collaborative functioning among the workforce. The mutual understanding between the workforce and the management of businesses helps in enhancing the operations thereby supporting the sustainable approach.

Saundry,  McArdle and  Thomas  (2013) stated that HR of organizations play a major role in undertaking negotiation with employees through designing policies that neither hurts the interests of the employees nor the management.  On the other hand, Lucero, Allenand and  Elzweig  (2013) stated that the provisions for workforce bargaining and the management’s initiative of looking after the welfare of the people supports the continuous and sustainable growth of businesses. Workplace safety is one of the major concerns that are considered during negotiations. Safe Work Australia aimed at improving the health and safety through different depictions of compensation for the employees (Donaghey et al., 2012). Gollan and Lewin (2013)stated that the smooth functioning of the business operations are based on the safety and health related compensations received by the employees as it ensures them of leading a healthy life while operating as per the objectives of the business. Workplace negotiations that are undertaken by businesses helps them in understanding he issues that are faced by the employees and the other stakeholders and thereby mitigate the same in order to undertake smooth functioning of the processes (Gill & Meyer, 2013). It also helps businesses in establishing a strong employee relation with the management. Marginson  (2015) stated that employee relation helps in inducing the collaborative functioning of the employees with the managerial changes. On the other hand, Gill and Meyer  (2013) stated that the enumeration of strong employee relation helps organizations in empowering the employees to undertake growth in their respective careers as per their qualifications and capabilities.

Negotiations for Improvement

The negotiations thereby help organizations in persuading the employees to accept changes in the processes through issuing different allowances and compensation structures. Yang et al.,  (2013) stated that the negotiations with the employees and consultation with the same helps organizations in enhancing the decision making systems of the same while operating on diverse economic contexts. The legal aspect of the negotiation is based on affirming a point on which the management and the employees agree to work and thereby set an objective for the organizational sustainability (Yang et al.,  2013).

Donaghey et al.,  (2012)stated that the workplace negotiations undertaken by businesses aims at encouraging the involvement of employees in the processes designed by the same. The key changes that are planned by businesses are successfully implemented through the active participation of the employees in the processes. On the other hand, Stewart et al.,  (2014) argued that the policies that are formed by businesses while operating in the diverse economies often affects the interests of the employees which reduce the rate of involvement of the same in the processes.  Therefore, the organizations must take steps to facilitate negotiations with the workforce in order to empower the activities through encouraging the active participation of the workforce. Townsend,  Wilkinson and Burgess (2014) stated that some 26.8% of the employees resist the organizational change as per an open survey conducted by businesses due to discrepancies in the wage and allowance structure.  The organizations might thereby take steps to develop payroll and incentives structure in order to satisfy the needs of the employees without compromising the profitability of the venture through negotiations. On the other hand, Gill and Meyer  (2013) argued that some 42 % of  the employees raised resistances to the organizational changes relating to the lack of workplace safety measures. Therefore, the organizations must also consider in bringing forth changes in the workplace safety measures in order to insure the employees against workplace accidents and thereby ensure the smooth functioning of the operations.

The key changes that are undertaken by businesses are based on the identification of the needs of the employees and thereby negotiating on terms of profitability and growth of the businesses. Stewart et al.,  (2014) stated that the major elements of change that are considered by businesses requires the support of the employees. Therefore, organizations must take steps to empower the employees through considering their interests and thereby formulating policies in order to adhere to the sustainable functioning of the business parameters. Negotiations with the employees help businesses in enhancing the employee relations of the same while operating on the objectives of the business. Yang et al.,  (2013) stated that the enhanced employee relations of organizations helps the same in bringing forth different positive changes in the culture to support sustainability in the international markets.

Importance of Employee Relations

 The different changes that are undertaken by businesses are dependent on the smooth functioning of the workforce, which is supported through the management’s concern of considering the interests of the employees.  Marginson  (2015) stated that flexible working schedules and feasible workloads helps businesses in enhancing the operations of the workforce.  On the other hand, Donaghey et al.,  (2012) stated that the policies that are formulated by the businesses must be created on the plane where neither the interests of the organization nor the employees are compromised for the sustainability of the business. Therefore, organizations must take suitable measures in order to enhance the operations through negotiations.  The negotiations arte better developed through the organization’s initiative of developing the culture of inclusion of the stakeholders in the business processes. The active participation of the stakeholders will be helping organizations in enhancing the operations of the same. Negotiations also helps the organizations in minimizing the risks due to misunderstanding between the management and the employees or the unions which ensure  the smooth functioning of the business operations. 

References

Bova, F. (2013). Labor unions and management’s incentive to signal a negative outlook. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 14-41.

Caraway, T. L., Rickard, S. J., & Anner, M. S. (2012). International negotiations and domestic politics: the case of IMF labor market conditionality. International Organization, 66(1), 27-61.

Cullinane, N., Donaghey, J., Dundon, T., Hickland, E., & Dobbins, T. (2014). Regulating for mutual gains? Non-union employee representation and the Information and Consultation Directive. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 810-828.

Da Costa, I., Pulignano, V., Rehfeldt, U., & Telljohann, V. (2012). Transnational negotiations and the Europeanization of industrial relations: Potential and obstacles. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(2), 123-137.

Donaghey, J., Cullinane, N., Dundon, T., & Dobbins, T. (2012). Non-union employee representation, union avoidance and the managerial agenda. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 33(2), 163-183.

Fujimoto, Y., Azmat, F., & Härtel, C. E. (2013). Gender perceptions of work-life balance: Management implications for full-time employees in Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 38(1), 147-170.

Gill, C., & Meyer, D. (2013). Union presence, employee relations and high performance work practices. Personnel Review, 42(5), 508-528.

Gollan, P. J., & Lewin, D. (2013). Employee Representation in Non?Union Firms: An Overview. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 52, 173-193.

Gollan, P. J., & Patmore, G. (2013). Perspectives of legal regulation and employment relations at the workplace: Limits and challenges for employee voice. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(4), 488-506.

Larsen, T. P., & Navrbjerg, S. E. (2015). The economic crisis: Testing employee relations. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 36(2), 331-353.

Layton, R., Smith, M., & Stewart, A. (2013). Equal remuneration under the Fair Work Act 2009.

Lucero, M. A., Allen, R. E., & Elzweig, B. (2013). Managing employee social networking: evolving views from the national labor relations board. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 25(3), 143-158.

Marginson, P. (2015). The changing nature of collective employment relations. Employee Relations, 37(6), 645-657.

Naughton, R. (2012). The role of Fair Work Australia in facilitating collective bargaining. Rediscovering Collective Bargaining: Australia’s Fair Work Act in International Perspective, 68-89.

Patty, A. (2018). Woolworths workers claim alleged $1 billion in underpayments. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/business/workplace/woolworths-workers-claim-alleged-1-billion-in-underpayments-20180823-p4zzbj.html

Saundry, R., McArdle, L., & Thomas, P. (2013). Reframing workplace relations? Conflict resolution and mediation in a primary care trust. Work, employment and society, 27(2), 213-231.

Schulten, T., & Brandt, T. (2012). Privatisation and the impact on labour relations. Privatisation of Public Services and Impacts for Employment, Working Conditions, and Service Quality in Europe. London & New York: Routledge, 136-152.

Stewart, A., Bray, M., Macneil, J., & Oxenbridge, S. (2014). ‘Promoting cooperative and productive workplace relations’: exploring the Fair Work Commission’s new role.

Toscano, N., & Schneiders, B. (2018). Woolworths wages in doubt after Coles scandal. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/business/workplace/woolworths-wages-in-doubt-after-coles-scandal-20160601-gp9cy6.html

Townsend, K., Wilkinson, A., & Burgess, J. (2014). Routes to partial success: Collaborative employment relations and employee engagement. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 915-930.

Yang, L. Q., Johnson, R. E., Zhang, X., Spector, P. E., & Xu, S. (2013). Relations of interpersonal unfairness with counterproductive work behavior: The moderating role of employee self-identity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(2), 189-202.