Explore the Sociology of Shari’a from a global perspective

Question:

Discuss About The Twelve Muslim Countries In Past And Present?

The Sociology of Shari’a: case study from around the world has been edited by Adam Possamai, James t. Richardson and Bryan S. Turner, New York, Springer (Edited) 2015. The Sociology of Shari’a: Case Studies from around the World is a comparative analysis of the various applications in contrast to the countries that has the Muslim minority and majority. It also provides a global analysis of Shari’a and his views on the Islamic law from the sociological perspective. It also explores some ground breaking perspectives that is based on the sociology of Shari’a that has the applications of the theories of Eisentadt and Chambliss. This book is an edited volume that has a collection of papers that presents an analysis in a comparative way on the development of the Shari’a in the different countries that has the maximum Muslim majority. The countries that follows are Malaysia, Turkey, Tunisia and Bangladesh (Possamai, Richardson & Turner, 2015).

The book Sociology of Shari’a provides a global analysis of the various important legal transformations and analyses the topic from the social perspective. This also explores the examples of the Non Western countries that has the maximum Muslim minority in their population that also includes China, Singapore, South Africa and Philippines. In the third part of the book the case study includes the various explorations from the ground breaking theories of the sociology of Sharia’a like the application of the Chambliss, Black and the perspectives of Eisenstein.

The Sociology of Shari’a: Case study from Around the World can be bought in one banner that includes 17 individual and comparative study of the case covers a geopolitical scope in a spectacular diversity. This diversity is often drawn from the authors that has a range of the various scientific, social and professional expertise. This edition follows a unified conceptual framework that is considered a legal pluralism (Jan Michiel, 2016). This volume has been used by the editor and the legal pluralism refers to the simple existence that can be found in one or more legal system. This legal pluralism demands a vast literature that needs to be developed over several decades that needs to have a considerable debate. The edited version of this book are not in terms with the literature on the legal pluralism. The editors of this book may be used with the concept of the legal pluralism that can be used as a framing device (Jan Michiel, 2016).

Analysis of various Shari’a applications in Muslim majority and minority countries

The framing device that can be used by the editor is to make a complete sense out of the volume article that has the concept of the political liberalism that can be found in the later works of John Rawl’ s (Kebede, 2016). This can be considered the work from where the editor drew the idea or rather the concept of overlapping the consensus in the comprehensive doctrines. This overlapping of consensus refers to such a state of affairs that has a stable liberal democracy in which the distinctive group that has their own normative order that includes regulating the vast areas of their life. There is a need for the affirmation in the political conception of justice that is based on the principles that is drawn from the integral part of the normative order. The idea of Rawl that is based on the political conception of the justice that is the central concept based on the overlapping consensus that also refers to the conception of unattached justice to the comprehensive doctrines (Jan Michiel, 2016). In many religious sects there is a need to seek order on the adherents moral and political lives that has been created for a specific purpose. The editors of the volume made a conclusion that the vision of Rawl is based on the overlapping consensus of the different comprehensive doctrines that will be difficult to make it secured (Jan Michiel, 2016).

In further developing the relations of the volumes in the 17 articles there is a need for the Rawlsian political liberalism and the legal pluralism that requires atleast one volume in its own. The framework of the legal pluralism of the editors has to be captured in order to get a variety in the volumes of the articles. The Rawlsian took up the article on the volume that has an afterthought that is more than the unifying thread. The fact is that the article of the volume has studies that is too variegated in order to be summarized in a thematic way or in a group that needs to be under one methodological heading (Rosen, 2014). It is viewed that each of them could stand alone. The articles that has been provided has to be pluralistic in their concept of the methodology that needs to impose on any one of the theoretical perspectives that can be reductive.

The common themes or the reference points in the Sociology of Sharia’a: case study has not been stressed and the risk of the volume is that it leaves the readers in an unsatisfied sense on the various diverse possible theoretical approaches (Bannerman, 2013). The sense need not be satisfied because it can get the impression by reading the volume by itself that has also contributed the scholars to never communicate about their work rather what they did is submitted it through their works from other disciplinary.

Ground-breaking perspectives based on the sociology of Shari’a and theories of Eisentadt and Chambliss

Turner and Richardson claimed that the sociological account of pluralism has various forms that constitutes the theories that has helped to explain the shape and hence eventually even the course of one’s future course needs to have such accommodations (Bowen, 2016). This can be considered an excellent point for the students to make an entry into the contemporary Islamic law that may be helpful for anyone to think that the way Islam is working out needs to be quite familiar with the way they develop.

In the book there is an introduction of the legal pluralism and Shari’a that also includes the three legal system in one state that has the social cohesion in a multi religious and multi ethnic way. The modern law is considered as the traditional ‘shalish’ in the activism of the civil society in Bangladesh. The book also contains the semi official Turkish Muslim legal pluralism that is based on the encounters between the unofficial Shari’a and the secular official law. Bryan S. Turner has elaborated on a topic that is the soft authoritarianism and also the legal pluralism and the social diversity (Bannerman, 2013). The Sharia case study is all about the different study that can be found all around the world about the boundaries of the religious freedom that needs to be regulated in those diverse society. The study from around the world that has religious freedom boundary that has regulations regarding the religion of the nimatullahiya, The boundary of the religious freedom is about the sociology that can be found around the world in various factors relating to the religious freedom. The computer science sociology of the case study of Sharia relates to the freedom that can be found in the religious freedom matters that may be of the diverse religion societal researches (Kebede, 2016).

Debates about the legal and the law pluralism of Shari’a has come to the forefront due to the political discourse that is found in the multicultural society. The comments that is about Shari’a is disengaged from the everyday point of life of the Muslims (Bannerman, 2013). The legal pluralism and Shari’a that is within the Eisenstadt’s multiple modernity thesis needs to be argued so that it work towards a new multi faith that is the pragmatic modern project. The plurality of the law of Islam is probably better than the well known and documented Muslim legal traditions. In the historical development, several schools of law emerged that helped on the site that has a variety of the opinions.

References

Bannerman, P. (Ed.). (2013). Islam in Perspective (RLE Politics of Islam): A Guide to Islamic Society, Politics and Law (Vol. 6). Routledge.

Bowen, J. R. (2016). On British Islam: Religion, Law, and Everyday Practice in Shari?a Councils. Princeton University Press.

Jan Michiel, O. (2016). Sharia Incorporated. A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present. Leiden University Press.

Kebede, M. (2016). The sociology of shari’a: case studies from around the world, edited by Adam Possamai, James T. Richardson and Bryan S. Turner: New York, Springer, 2015, viii+ 328 pp.,£ 72.00 (hardback), ISBN 978-3-319-09604-9.

Possamai, A., Richardson, J. T., & Turner, B. S. (Eds.). (2015). The Sociology of Shari’a: Case Studies from Around the World. Cham: Springer.

Rosen, L. (2014). Book Review: Family Law in Islam: Divorce, Marriage and Women in the Muslim World; Self-Determination and Women’s Rights in Muslim Societies. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. University of London, 77(1), 208.