The High Quality Institute (HQI), a technological training institute operates in the educational sector, offering courses in information and communication technology. The institution seeks to develop and deploy an advance Teaching and Learning System (TLS). The intended system will provide a range of services such as staff and student emails and a database management system for the institution. As such the project to develop this application will also entail configuring a database server a management, web and email servers.
Besides the configuration of the servers, a complete IT infrastructure has to be established at the institutions to support the deployment of the intended system as well as provide a secure and highly available communication and networking platform. The intended network will use a range of network devices including routers, intrusion detection systems and backup solutions.
The intension of the management at the institution is to develop and deploy two online systems; an Undergraduate Learning System (ULS) and a Postgraduate Learning System (PLS). These systems will be developed internally by the IT department of the institute.
The aim and objective of this report is to present a system analysis and design of the intended system for the institution. This will entail identifying the functional and non-functional requirements of the proposed Teaching and Learning System (TLS). The report will present a Work Breakdown Structure which will identify the various tasks required to accomplish this project. A PERT/CPM chart will then be developed. This will be followed by the identification of the critical path and time requirements for the project. The report also presents a data model of the student registration process by use of class diagrams. Finally the report presents calculations for the net present value, payback period and return on investment.
Theoretically, functional requirements refer to the expected functioning of the system to be developed. These are the system’s features or what the system should do or provider for users. Functional requirements include the functions, reports, online queries and details of data to be held by the system. On the other hand, Non-functional requirements refer to controls, constraints and attributes, which describe the systems and can be used in judging the performance of the system. These include attributes such as security, performance level, availability, reliability and usability.
Although the case study does not explicitly mention the course and units, from the other functional requirements, the system must have a function to keep track of all courses and units offered by the institution.
A Work breakdown structure WBS outlines activities necessary to be performed in a project to attain the project’s deliverables. A WBS outlines the activities in a hierarchical subdivision of the project’s tasks into work areas, with the lowest level forming a work package. In a project a WBS forms the base of all the project management tasks from project planning, cost estimation, resource allocation and project scheduling. The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) defines a work breakdown structure as a “deliverable oriented hierarchical decomposition of the work to be executed by the project team”. A WBS provides a structural view into a project. The main functions of a work breakdown structure include;
The work breakdown Structure for this project is as follows;
Task No |
Description |
Predecessors |
Duration |
1. |
Teaching and Learning System |
180 days |
|
2. |
Project Initiation and Planning |
7 days |
|
3. |
Project kickoff meeting |
1 day |
|
4. |
Stakeholder Identification |
1 day |
|
5. |
Risk Identification |
4 |
2 days |
6. |
Development of a project plan |
5 |
3 days |
7. |
Milestone 1: Project Charter Approved |
0 days |
|
8. |
Requirement Analysis |
12 days |
|
9. |
Requirement gathering |
5 days |
|
10. |
Functional Requirements analysis |
9 |
4 days |
11. |
Analysis of non-functional requirements |
10 |
3 days |
12. |
Milestone 2: System Requirements approved |
0 days |
|
13. |
Application Design |
12 days |
|
14. |
Application Basic Design |
5 days |
|
15. |
Technical Feasibility Assessment |
14 |
2 days |
16. |
Architectural Reference Group Presentation |
14,15 |
2 days |
17. |
Application Detailed Design |
15 |
5 days |
18. |
Milestone 3: Detailed Design Approval |
0 days |
|
19. |
Infrastructure Development |
11 |
11 days |
20. |
Network design |
12 |
3 days |
21. |
Laying of the network |
20 |
3 days |
22. |
Servers installation |
21 |
2 days |
23. |
Network and Servers configuration |
22 |
2 days |
24. |
Network testing |
23 |
1 day |
25. |
Development |
44 days |
|
26. |
Coding |
18 |
20 days |
27. |
Unit testing |
26 |
2 days |
28. |
Integration testing |
26 |
2 days |
29. |
Debugging |
28 |
2 days |
30. |
Milestone 4: Development Complete |
0 days |
|
31. |
Testing |
16 days |
|
32. |
Complete System testing |
30 |
2 days |
33. |
Debugging |
32 |
2 days |
34. |
User Acceptance Testing |
32 |
2 days |
35. |
System & User Interface Bug Fix |
33,34 |
2 days |
36. |
Milestone 5: Testing Completed |
0 days |
|
37. |
Launch |
6 days |
|
38. |
User Training |
36 |
5 days |
39. |
Deployment and GoLive |
38 |
1 day |
40. |
Closure |
10 days |
|
41. |
Document Lessons Learnt |
39 |
1 day |
42. |
Release Project Team |
41 |
1 day |
43. |
Finalize and Archive Project Documentation |
41 |
3 days |
44. |
Close Project |
43 |
1 day |
From the network diagram above, the critical path for the completion of the project is made up of;
In calculating the NPV the rate was taken to be 0 since the investment is a system
YEAR |
|||||||
No |
Category |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Value of benefits |
7000 |
7000 |
7000 |
7000 |
7000 |
|
2 |
Development Cost |
-20000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Annual Expenses |
-2000 |
-2000 |
-2000 |
-2000 |
-2000 |
|
4 |
Net benefits/costs |
10000 |
5000 |
5000 |
5000 |
5000 |
5000 |
5 |
Discount factor |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
Net Present value |
($10,000.00) |
($5,000.00) |
($5,000.00) |
($5,000.00) |
($5,000.00) |
($5,000.00) |
7 |
Cumulative NPV |
($10,000.00) |
($5,000.00) |
$0.00 |
$5,000.00 |
$10,000.00 |
$15,000.00 |
From the cumulative NPV the payback period is 2 years.
Initial investment was 20,000 but year zero had a return of 10,000, meaning the effective initial investment was -10,000
Year |
Cash Flow |
Payback |
0 |
-10000 |
|
1 |
5000 |
-5000 |
2 |
5000 |
0 |
3 |
5000 |
|
4 |
5000 |
|
5 |
5000 |
Initial investment was 20,000 but year zero had a return of 10,000, meaning the effective initial investment was -10,000
Year |
Cash Flow |
0 |
-10000 |
1 |
5000 |
2 |
5000 |
3 |
5000 |
4 |
5000 |
5 |
5000 |
Total discounted benefit amount = 25,000
Total discounted cost amount = 10000
ROI = (benefit – cost) / cost = (25,000 – 10000)/10000 = 1.5
Therefore return on investment = 150%
Conclusion
This report has presented an outline of a project intended to develop a Teaching and Learning System (TLS) at the Quality Institute (HQI). The report has presented a system analysis and design of the intended system. The identified functional and non-functional requirements of the proposed Teaching and Learning System (TLS) have been presented. The report has also presented a Work Breakdown Structure which identifies the various tasks required to accomplish this project. A PERT/CPM chart was developed, which outlines the critical path for the project. . The report also presented a data model of the student registration process by use of a class diagram. Finally the report presents calculations for the net present value, payback period and return on investment. From the analysis, the project is a very viable one, with a very high return on investment and a short payback period. The project should therefore continue to the implementation stage as it is feasible and viable.
References
Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques. New Jersey, USA.
Dennis, A., Wixom, B. H., & Tegarden, D. (2015). Systems analysis and design: An object-oriented approach with UML. John Wiley & Sons.
Hobel, B., & Schütte, S. Work Breakdown Structure.
Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. (2013). Project Management: The Managerial Process with MS Project. McGraw-Hill.
Li, F. L., Horkoff, J., Mylopoulos, J., Guizzardi, R. S., Guizzardi, G., Borgida, A., & Liu, L.(2014). Non-functional requirements as qualities, with a spice of ontology. In Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2014 IEEE 22nd International (pp. 293-302). IEEE.
Wiegers, K., & Beatty, J. (2013). Software requirements. Pearson Education.
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality
Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.
We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.
We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.
We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.
We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.