Melbourne Fire Brigade (MFB)

Describe about the “Mfb Melbourne Fire Brigade”. 

This task aims at analyzing the risk assessment in Melbourne Fire Brigade through comparison of models. In addition to that the eventual outcome of fire through probality matrix, risk analysis and risk register are used to explain further on the operations and activies of the fire station. The risk structure break down provides a general summary of the whole organization in stages and easier way. The essentials and challenges in the model are pointed out in the course of the paper. 

Risks assessment models

Fig 1 

Risk levels indicated in the table above form the basis for deciding on whether it is necessary to improve existing controls or introduce new ones , as well as the timing of actions :
• The strategy to be followed in the risk assessment includes the following steps :
Danger Identification
• Risk valuation according to the possibility of becoming accident and the outcomes of the catastrophe
• Deduct tolerable

The Risk Regulation Strategy must include guidelines for :
• Combat the risks at base
• Adapt work to the individual , together with the choice of accessories and techniques of work and production , with a view in particular to getting rid of monotonous and recurring work in order to reduce its effects on overall health .
• Take into consideration the development of technology .
• Replace the hazardous by involving minimal risk
• Adopt procedures that put combined effort protection to the individual .
• Giving suitable instructions to workers ( Tanaka , Akimoto , & Inoue , 2012 ) .

This plan should be evaluated routinely to make changes if changes in jobs .
The company must have for specifications of the Act with an overview of the final results of the Risk Assessment ; Endeavours should be intended to reduce the risk , determining the necessary investments . Measures to reduce the risk should be carried out in a given period . When the measured risk is associated with extremely harmful consequences , further action will be needed to establish more precisely the likelihood of harm as a basis for determining the need for improved control measures ( Stockstrom & Herstatt , 2012 ) .

Risk assessment model Fig.2

Inputs

• Initial evaluate and periodically each of the production procedures of the business from a proactive point of view .
• Analyze modern production processes from model , eliminating hazards at their source
• Control processes from a precautionary point of view .
• Remove all of the the dangers which can be technically and monetarily possible , setting up plans to eliminate the dangers that simply cannot be today , it may be the average and long lasting .
• Establish collective safety measures to keep workers off from the dangers that could not be eliminated
• Establish combined effort safety measures for protection
• Systematically create basic safety inspections ( Hu , 2013 ) .
• Inform personnel of the risks and hazards to which they are subjected .
• Adequately educate workers in the utilization of protective measures established
• Periodically assess all technical measures taken to guarantee continuous development .
Outputs
• High Setting of specifications and general or used on processes or alternatively methods specific administration areas . This model requires to be followed to the later and if any stage is skipped the whole model collapse .
• Procedures preventive approach requires highly sophisticated apparatus and very costly in the acquisition of protective materials , vehicles , alarm system and all the necessary equipment required for its operation ( Vasilcovschi & Munteanu , 2014 ) .
• There is need for setting specifications and contractual commitments , contracts and subcontracts , to ensure information and coordination on prevention .
• Inner rules as well as processes for the allocation of staff ( completely new hires or even transforms job ) , guaranteeing fitness ( prior healthcare evaluation ) , working out , needed training , guidance in the work of the job to fill and obligatory information risks in the same .
• Specifications as well as methods for working with special hazards and formalize work permits .
• Rules and also operating processes essential to enforce fulfillment with preventive measures set up in the standard growth and development of the activity ( research of incidents as well as incidents , basic safety information sheets tasks , etc .
• Set in conjunction with the specialized office preventive routine maintenance programs and reviews premises , equipment and also facilities ( Heckerman & Mamdani , n .d . ).

There first motel shows a centralized way of handling the risk of fire at hand while the second is a structure that has been disintegrated to handle the risk .
The current model is structure in stages while the model subject is a way in which without a certain procedure followed will still function normally .
No need to improve preventive action . However , improvements should be considered more cost-effective solutions or which do not have a significant economic burden .
Periodic checks are required to ensure the effectiveness of control measures is maintained .
Risk assessments for which there is no specific legislation : We must use international or national standards or technical official body or bodies of reputable guides .
Risk assessments that require specific methods of analysis : contemplating serious risks such as fires , explosions , etc . which they have specific legislation ( Xiao , 2012 ) .

Risks Assessment Models

This is the arrangement of risks from the top to the lowest by decomposing the highest risks as you move down the structure.

1. The fire station organization – It includes:

• inadequate funding due to allocation of less revenue by the county government of Melbourne and few or no wellwishers input.
• Activies schedules maybe unorganized or less defined.
• Unrealistics goals for the organization that may lead to failure.

1. External risks – It includes:

• Catastrophic occurances such as earthquakes or even storms.
• Weather conditions that might be unfavourable such as windy conditions that spread fire faster and randomly.
• Workers’ issues that includes sickness, strikes, inadequate equipments and so forth

1. Technical Risks – It includes:

• Untested technology that might go wrong or give negative results.
• Performance risks where workers input may be below par.
• Quality of technology that is not upto the level of dealing with big fire situations.

1. Management risk – It includes:

• Planning of resources and time because these two are important in ensuring that the fire risk is eliminated completely if the allocation is right.
• Cost estimates maybe overestimated or underestimated whereby the risk of failure is more.
• Budget and equipments is important in planning ahead and ensuring efficiency operation of the fire brigade station.

A . Category of work routines

a preliminary danger evaluation step is to prepare a list of work activities , grouping them in a rational and also feasible way ( De Marchi , 2003 ) . One possible way of classifying function activities is as follows :

1 . Exterior centers of the company Areas .
2 . Levels in the production process or perhaps in offering a service .
3 . Job and structured maintenance .
4 . Projects defined , for instance , forklift wheelers .

For each and every work , activity could possibly be necessary to have data , inter alia on the following elements :

to . Tasks . Its length and rate of recurrence .
b . Areas exactly where work is done .
c . Who does indeed the work , both of them long lasting and informal .
d . Some people who could possibly be affected by work actions .
And . Training programs has personnel had on the performance of his obligations .

Qualitative techniques : are characterized by not switching to numerical computations . They can be general methods together with relative methods .

Semi qualitative methods : the will need to initiate a quantitative assessment concerning frequencies of occurrence of a particular occasion because they are known as strategies to determining number of occurrence , or epitomized by resorting to a category of the areas of a facility depending on a series quantifying damages index : dangers indices .
The following table gives a simple method for estimating the risk levels according to their estimated probability and its expected consequences ( Chen , 2013 ) .  

Risk Register is an application used in management of risks and also known as risk log. Risk registers maybe either qualitive or quantitive depending on the probalities; qualitive is the level used medium, low or high while quantitive is the numerical such as MFB case as shown below.

Since the probability is linked directly to the results of experience, the fact that an event occurs, you can change the probability of others. The process of making data on fire history, explore and further tests illustrates this principle (Zhang, 2013).

The probability that event A occurs if the B event has occurred is called conditional probability defined and this definition is consistent, i.e. meets the probability axioms. 

Conclusion 

The models used in Melbourne Fire Brigade are effective and are stilling doing great service to the community at large. However, as illustrated in the first model few alterations ought to be done to eensure faster and timely response to fire risk. Also the station has a structure that is ideally focused to the local people and through use of probality index they ought to asses their alternatives in future. The risk register as shown has the capability to summarise data entry and it is easier to retrieve information in future with it regularly visited by any assigned groupor individual. 

References

Chen, J. & Sun, C. (2010). Nanoparticles: Aspects of Safety and Risk Management. AMR, 113-116, 222-225. 

De Marchi, B. (2003). Comments on Ortwin Renn’s article ‘Hormesis and risk communication’: considerations about uncertainity, ignorance and governance. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 22(1), 25-29. 

Heckerman, D. & Mamdani, A. Uncertainty in artificial intelligence.

Hu, Z. (2013). Preventive Resettlement and Risk Reduction Strategy Analysis in Disaster Risk Management System. AMR, 838-841, 2185-2189. 

Stockstrom, C. & Herstatt, C. (2012). Planning and uncertainity in new product development. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 40(4), 68-79. 

Tanaka, K., Akimoto, H., & Inoue, M. (2012). Production risk management system with demand probability distribution. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(1), 46-

Vasilcovschi, N. & Munteanu, G. (2014). IDEAS in AGORA: Decision-Making Risk: The Difference Between Risk And Uncertainity In Economic Activities. Human And 

Wang, Y. (2012). International Logistics Risk Management. AMR, 433-440, 3112-3116. 

Xiao, X. (2012). Business Logistics Outsourcing Risk and Management. AMR, 479-481, 1718-1721.

Zhang, L. (2013). Research of Risk Management About Construction Enterprises. AMR, 838-841, 3127-3130.