The objectives of the bridge construction project initiated by Auckland transportation project include:
Critical success factors include
No Action
If no action is taken then the objectives of the Auckland Transportations would not be met and the transportation network would not be able to provide the accommodation for the future growth of traffic. This would lead to a port performance of the network and increase the congestion on the roads. With these problems increased, the quality of life of the nearby residents would reduce.
The existing transportation infrastructure already has constraints that are not sufficient to accommodate any growth in the traffic. Another problem is that in the case of any natural calamity striking the region; the Whangaparaoa community would become completely isolated making it difficult for the network to serve the transportation needs of the residents. The traffic is already on rising on the Hibiscus coastal highway and there is an inefficient utilization of land use.
Increasing Ferries and Bus Services
If the number of bus services and ferries is increased, it would help accommodate the public traffic and many private vehicle travelers would be diverted to use these public transport vehicles. However, the number of commuters who travel by bus is only 4% and those traveling by ferries are evens less in numbers. Most passengers use private vehicles to travel. Although, the move would divert some traffic to public transport modes the same would not be significant enough to make any major transformation in the performance of the public transportation system.
The ferry services are provided by the Central Business District of Auckland and the Gulf harbor and these services include only 6 sails on weekdays. Thus, the numbers of people who depend on this transportation mode are less in numbers. Thus, increase in ferry would not be a very effective measure for solving traffic problems.
Widening of Whangarapaoa Road
Widening of the road would need an increase in all the four lanes that are spread across the coastal highway of Hibiscus. This would lead to a modal shift in people using other modes to coastal road route. However, this option also has some adverse impacts on the society as well as the environment. While the construction is going on, the region would face major road blocks and the traffic would temporarily increase causing disturbance to the travelers. It would resolve the traffic conflict after construction but only to a certain extent as when the traffic would grow, the scalability of the roads would not be too high. Moreover, this option would also incur extra costs of up to $26 million over the cost of construction of the bridge.
Improvement of the Coastal Highway
Improvement of the highway would reduce congestion to some extent on the Whangarapaoa road which is currently caused due to grade separations at the intersections. However, this alternative would require additional structures to be made because of the typographical constraints of the road if the land use has to be improved which can be a significant cost to the company. Despite these investments, the reduction in congestion would only be marginal. Moreover, to make up for the capacity constraints, the road would have to be widened which would be an additional cost on the project.
Penlink Bridge construction
A construction of the bridge over Stillwater and Weiti River between Redvale and Whangaparaoa Road would add additional roads for transportation thereby dividing the traffic between the existing and the road on the bridge. This would reduce the traffic on the old road thereby reducing congestion. With additional transportation mode through the Penlink Bridge, the provisions would also be made for accommodating traffic resulting from future developments. This would improve the efficiency and reliability of the overall transportation network.
The most appropriate option for the project would be a construction of the Penlink Bridge as it would improve the current traffic condition as well as make way for accommodation for future developments. Thus, it is the recommended option. This option would help most in achieving objectives of the Auckland Transport system because of the following reasons:
For the business benefit from the project, a toll strategy can be recommended which would bring most benefits to the stakeholders through the following features:
The project scope includes following activities:
The Penlink bridge construction project has some constraints like:
The project also has some dependencies such as:
The project scope defines some activities that have to be completed as per the scheduled timeline. The progress of the project would be monitored to check if it is going as per the scope of the project and in case there are deviations, corrective actions would be taken immediately to ensure all the activities defined in the project scope are completed as per the project plan.
Project deliverables include
Key performance indicators include
The bridge construction project would be headed by CEO who would have a team of group managers. Group managers would head the project manager who would be responsible for ensuring that all the project deliverables are met within the scope and as per the time schedule defined in the project plan. Five core activities would be monitored by the project manager including planning, designing, cost, stakeholder communication, and risk management. For executing the project tasks, the project manager would hire project team members including leaders and junior managers.
For establishing the governance structure on the project, 5 Project Directors would be employed who would be taking all the major decisions on the project. Auckland transport unit would be responsible for appointing them. Auckland Council will appoint additional two directors.
Project managers would have divisional managers and department managers under him. If there are any issues on the project then they would e escalated by the divisional manager to the transportation board. The business case documentation, its review, and authorization would be done by department managers (CHAKOUR & MAZZOTTI, 2015).
The project sponsor has following responsibilities:
The project costs and expenses would be reported monthly with the comparison of actual costs of the project against the budgeted figures. If the deviation in costs is more than $500,000 then it would need authorization from the Project Sponsor to proceed with the project. The sponsor would review the project monthly and approve a release of funds as per the project requirement.
When the project would be in the closing phase, a lessons report would be prepared by the project manager based on the updates from the project team members. The project team members would do the reporting every week while the project manager would report the progress to the project sponsor every month. The project progress would be reported to key stakeholders on the quarterly basis including details of achievements of the milestones (Caltrans, 2007).
A traditional Public Private Partnership model would be used for procurement on the project. The procurement would include purchase and procurement of construction materials, equipment, structures, contractual work and intellectual property. The PPP option has been chosen for the management of procurement of the project as it would provide the project value for money.
Various modes of communication would be used with project stakeholders including personal meetings, emails, focus group discussions, letters, interviews, and surveys. Key stakeholders of a Penlink project include:
The bridge construction would be completed in 3 years. Before beginning the process of construction, the site has to be made ready by following steps:
The project would get funds from multiple sources including:
For operating the bridge profitably, the project would involve collection at the toll points using specific fee structures (Land Transport Authority, 2012)
This project would face certain risk such as:
For the management of the quality of management processes and deliverables, following steps would be taken
The project would be considered as completed when it has all the deliverables met with desired quality standards of construction. The outcomes of the project have to be approved by the project sponsor and the payments need to be given to contractors and their workers before marking the project as complete (LaHood, 2010).
After the construction of the bridge is completed, the returns received in the first year would be 7.5%. In addition to this, there would be long-term monetary benefits that would result from the operation of the bridge and these include:
The total financial benefits of the project would add up to $760 million.
References
BASE Energy Inc., (2007). ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENTof Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Train Cars. PC&E.
ACTE . (2012). Mobile Payment – How It Will Transform Corporate Travel and Expense Management. AirPlus International.
Andrle, S. J. (1999). Highlights of the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. Federal Transit Administration.
Auckland Council. (2013). Business Case for Implementation. Auckland Transport.
Caltrans. (2007). Project Communication Handbook. Caltrans.
CH2M HILL and Good Company. (2009). Transportation and Sustainability Best Practices Background . Gallaudet University Kellogg Center .
CHAKOUR, P., & MAZZOTTI, P. (2015). Construction Management Transformed by the Critical Chain Method. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from https://www.tocico.org/mpage/Chakour9_7IND
Cisco. (2014). Dubai Harnesses IoE to Make Roads Safer and to Increase Usage of Public Transportation . Cisco.
Deloitte Risk Journal Editor. . (2015). Dubai’s RTA: Applying State-of-the-Art Risk Management to a Transport Infrastructure. Retrieved July 25, 2015, from https://deloitte.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/2015/07/13/dubais-rta-applying-state-of-the-art-risk-management-to-a-transport-infrastructure/
DOTD. (2008). LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT . DOTD.
Federal Highway Administration. (2015). Tunnel Operations, Maintenance, Inspection, and Evaluation (TOMIE) Manual. US Department of Transportation.
Hensher, D. A. (2000). Urban Public Transport Challenges. The Drawng Board: An Australian Review of Public Affiars, 1(2), 47-62.
LaHood, R. (2010). Transportation’s Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. U.S. Department of Transportation.
Land Transport Authority. (2012). Code of Practice: Street Work Proposals relating to Development Works. Land Transport Authority.
Li, Z., & Hensher, D. A. (2013). Crowding in Public Transport: A Review of Objective and Subjective Measures. Journal of Public Transportation, 16(2), 107-134.
Litman, T. (2016). Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Mayor of London. (2015). London Infrastructure Plan 2050: Transport Supporting Paper. London Government.
McGill, J. (2015). TRANSPORT TRANSFORMATION London Calling: The Great Crossrail Project. FTI COnsulting.
Pieplow, B. (2012). Project Risk Management Handbook: A Scalable Approach . Caltrans.
US Department of Transportation. (2015). THE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT FULLY ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS. Department of Transportation.
WSDOT. (2015). Cost Estimating Manual for Projects. Washington State Department of Transportation.
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality