Questions:
You are required to write a research essay addressing all of following points:
• Who are directors of company? W hat are their duties of directors under Australia Corporation Law?
• Give a short history of the evolution of director’s duties and responsibilities. Please enumerate their duties and responsibilities today. Are their duties the same in proprietary companies and public companies?
• Explain the consequences should directors contravene the law and the remedies available.
• What do you see in the future direction of director’s duties in Australia?
• Please cite relevant case law and the statutes in your answer and provide proper references.
The term director may be defined under section 9 of the Corporations Act of 2001. Under that section the directors mean any person who has been appointed validly as director or alternate director. In accordance to that section, any person who is not validly appointed as a director but acts in that position of any director shall be deemed as a director. The section also states that any person who is not appointed validly as director but the nominated directors’ work in accordance to the wishes and instruction of that person, then such person should be deemed the director (Aier, Chen & Pevzner, 2014). The director governs a company on the behalf of the shareholders of such company. The Corporations Act of 2001 under section 198A (1) states that business of any company is managed under or by the direction of its directors. All the directors in any corporation have certain primary legal responsibilities and duties. The responsibilities and the duties that are imposed on the directors under the Corporations Act of 2001 makes the application to several structures of organization. Such structures are proprietary companies and public companies (Chan, Daniel & Young, 2014).
There are several other laws that regulate the activities of every company. Such activities include firing, hiring, renting office and marketing. There are approximately 600 such laws through which the directors could be held liable personally. The examples for such laws make the inclusion of the law of taxation, competition law, occupational safety and health and environmental law. There are also the specific industries that have their specialized law (Grove, 2013).
There is the requirement of the Corporations Act of 2001 that demands the public companies to have minimum three directors and two of such directors must reside in the territory of Australia. In the proprietary companies, there has to be minimum one director and that person must reside ordinarily in the territory of Australia (Hazen & Hazen, 2012). This is stated in Section 201A of the Corporations Act of 2001. In case if there is a proprietary company having only one director and who is also the shareholder, the second director is entitled to be appointed by the director who is original by recording such appointment and by signing that record. This is provided in section 201F of the Corporations Act of 2001.
The directors are charged strictly for the exercise of their powers for any purpose that is proper. For example, where the director is under the obligation of making the issue of new shares for not the purpose of raising the capital but for the purpose of defeating any takeover bid that is potential, then such act would be regarded as a purpose that is not proper (Iida, 2015). However, there are several jurisdictions where the members of any company are granted the permission to make the ratification of the transactions that would fall foul for the said principle. In several jurisdictions, it is accepted largely that the said principle should have the capability of getting abrogated in the constitution of the company (Hudson, 2012).
It is of immense importance that the directors use the powers for any proper purpose. There are several instances where the improper use of the power by the directors is evident. Such improper use involves the diverting of any opportunities of investment to any relative. Such breaches of the duties of the directors are termed as the failure of the directors to act in good faith. There are greater difficulties that arise in those situations while performing the duty of acting in good faith, the director serves any purpose that is under law is considered as proper.
In the case of Howard Smith Ltd v. Ampol Ltd [1974] AC 832, the Privy Council made the decision regarding the seminal authority that determines the proper purpose. The said case is concerned with the powers of the directors for the making the issue of the new shares. There was the allegation that the directors made the issue of the shares in order to make the deprivation of the voting majority of a particular shareholder (Gerner-Beuerle, Paech & Schuster, 2013). The argument was rejected by the court by stating that the power of issuing of the share could only be exercised only for the purpose of raising new capital (Keay, 2012). The Court also held that it would be considered as the proper exercise of the powers of the directors for making the issue of the shares for the purpose of ensuring the financial stability of the company.
The duties of the directors also make the inclusion of making the promotion of the success of the company. It is considered as the duty of the director to make the promotion of the goodwill and success of any company its members benefit as a whole. This sets out six factors that are to fulfilled by the directors while making the performance of their duties. Such factors are potential consequences of any decision of the director in the long-term, the employee’s interests, and the requirement of making the fostering the relationship of the business with the customers and suppliers and others. The other factors are the impact of the decision of the directors in the operations of the company on the environment and community (Knepper et al., 2015). The other factor is that the desirability of the decision of the director in maintaining the goodwill and reputation regarding the maintenance of the high standards of conduct of business in any company. The last factor is that the need of the decision of the directors to act in fair terms between the employees of any company (Gerner-Beuerle, Paech & Schuster, 2013).
The discussion of the above facts makes the establishment of the diversion of from the traditional notion that the duties of the directors are owed simply to the company. In the case of Mills v Mills (1938) 60 CLR 150, difficult questions arose regarding treating of any company by the directors too abstractly. It was held by the Court in that case that it is not required under law that the directors would live in “an unreal region of detached altruism and to act in the vague mood of ideal abstraction from obvious facts, which must be present to the mind of any honest and intelligent man when he exercises his powers as a director.”
In the case of Hutton v. West Cork Railway Co (1883) 23 Ch D 654, it was held by the Court that the directors without the consent of the company, cannot fetter their sole discretion relating to the entering of any contract that makes the binding of the company with certain course. It cannot be done even if that course requires the wide approval in the future (Laster & Zeberkiewicz, 2015). It is the company that remains bound but the directors retains the discretion to make the use of their right of voting against the factor of taking the decisions or actions of the future of the company.
In the case of Re City Equitable Fire Insurance Co [1925] Ch 407, the Court held that any director is required to make the exhibition of his duties in a greater degree that involves that amount of skill that is expected from that experience and knowledge of any reasonable person (Pearce, 2016).
In the case of Hogg v. Cramphorn Ltd. [1967] Ch 254, it has been held by the Court, that the directors could not compete clearly without having a conflict of interest arising with any company. The Court also held that the director of any particular company cannot act as director of any company that is the competitor of that company. It is because if that happens then each of the company would start conflicting with one another (Strine, 2014).
The company is under law regarded as the separate person and hence could bring the claim against its director who is erring with the company. The company can bring the claim against its director if it can prove that it has sustained some kind of loss from the wrongful action of the director. In case the director makes some personal profit that is undue, then that director may be required to make the surrender of that gain in the favor of the company. In case any contract is entered into by, any director of any company by making the breach of his duty should be considered as void. Such contract should be considered as void even if that contract is open for ratification by the company in the future terms.
Reference List
Aier, J. K., Chen, L., & Pevzner, M. (2014). Debtholders’ demand for conservatism: Evidence from changes in directors’ fiduciary duties. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 993-1027.
Chan, R. S. Y., Daniel, H. O., & Young, A. (2014). Rethinking the Relevance or Irrelevance of Directors’ Duties in China: The Intersection between Culture and Laws. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 1(1), 183.
Fairfax, L. M. (2013). Sue on Pay: Say on Pay’s Impact on Directors’ Fiduciary Duties. Ariz. L. Rev., 55, 1.
Gerner-Beuerle, C., & Schuster, E. P. (2014). The evolving structure of directors’ duties in Europe. European Business Organization Law Review,15(02), 191-233.
Gerner-Beuerle, C., Paech, P., & Schuster, E. P. (2013). Study on directors’ duties and liability.
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality
Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.
We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.
We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.
We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.
We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.