Discuss About The Critical Analysis Humanitarian Intervention.
Department of foreign affairs and trade released a document to evaluate the human interventions provided and how well Australian government responded to that situation during a cyclone pam hit Vanuatu Country. This article was published in 2017 by DFAT, Canberra. On 13 March 2015 tropical cyclone struck many areas of Vanuatu with wind speed of 270 km/h (Hong et al., 2018). According to Magee, Danielle, Verdon-Kidd, Kiem and Royle (2015), it was the most disastrous cyclone ever faced in history. As discussed in DFAT evaluation report this cyclone pam affected most of the population and damaged 90% of the infrastructure. The destruction impacts all of the areas like agriculture, education, health facilities, private property etc. It was estimated that around half of people were faced adverse situation because of this cyclone.
Thousands of people displaced internally, high number people had no place to live and were searching for shelter. At that time Vanuatu government had limited resources and money to overcome this situation so they asked for help to all courtiers and they received help from all over the globe, but Australia was the first nation responded quickly to support people who were in trouble. According to news published by Ministry for Foreign Affairs (2018) Julie Bishop (Minister of foreign affairs) announced to provide financial help of $300,000 especially for people with disabilities. New Zealand announced financial help of NZ$ 2.5 million (Hayward-Jones, 2015). Australian government and other departments sanctioned more than $15 million to recover from negative impacts occurred due to cyclone. Military assistance also provided relief services the people of Vanuatu (Bergin, 2015).Various other organisations like the Australian Red Cross, Red Crescent and other private sectors also helped financially to support to Vanuatu government. This article analysed effectiveness of services provided to the cyclone affected people and humanitarian intervention evaluation report will be analysed critically. Methods, purposes, criteria used, appropriateness of the findings and how different these were from services provided with other organisation, will be discussed by reviewing the report of DFAT and other various reports. It will also be analysed that whether the intervention mentioned in that document were up to the mark or not.
UNICEF (2016) conducted a review article after six months of cyclone hit Vanuatu. Some key findings of that study are:
A study conducted by Handmer and Iveson (2017) stated that people of Vanuatu warned on time by using text , mobile phones etc. and it was found that text messages were more effective to send warnings of cyclone pam within a population, and this becomes the reason of low deaths occurred. Local people were alerted by youth (Ray, De, Leone, & Gilbert, 2017).
According to an article published in Health Cluster bulletin by Ministry of health Vanuatu (2015), most of the health facilities were affected, health services has been decreased in all areas of health assistance, the availability of health staff including doctors and nurses were very less at the time of cyclone hit Vanuatu, Shefa was the highly affected area with nearly 88% damage of health facilities and in Tafea around 82 % health facilities were affected. A news article published in BBC news (2016) just after 3 days of cyclone hit Vanuatu reported that around 3300 people displaced and 24 died.
Study conducted by Care (2016) reveals that in there was less damage was reported in Aniwa and compare to other areas like Erromango and Tanna where more than 60% structure were damaged or destroyed.
It was a cross a sectional study. Peoples from Vanuata and Fiji were interviewed about the effectiveness of interventions provided at the time of cyclone. Focused Group Discussion has been conducted among respondents.
The documents were reviewed and coded to prepare questionnaires. Some government organisation and DFAT provided these documents. Strategies, appeals and reports, studies etc. mentioned in these documents mentioned.
The whole study was based on data collected from interviewed person. Thirty nine participants were Australian government officials, 30 respondents from Vanuata government, 55 partner staff; ten were from private sector of Vanuata and Fiji and 5 stakeholders of Australia. They were asked evaluation questions to acquire key information about the assistance efficacy, effectiveness of assistance and recommendations. Detailed notes have also been taken from each interview by audio recordings.
The people from highly affected areas like Efate, Tanna and Erromango called to participate in focused group discussion. The FGD were well designed and based on structured guide. Some activities conducted among 14 groups of beneficiaries. In one activity they asked participants to place pebble in the middle of the group and express their thoughts on a particular situation. One more activity conducted by staff members was to assess the understanding of participants about the importance of services. They asked to place a leaf or pebble on an image showing the services they required just after the clone or some months later. The pictures were about shelter, food medical services, water, transport, food etc. After they placed their pebble on picture they were asked to explain the reason of placing leaf or pebble on that particular image.
The basic principle of this evaluation was to identify the quality and efficacy of the interventions provided to the pacific island countries at the time of cyclone by Australian government and department of foreign affairs and trade. It worked on a principle of getting live comments from public by interviewing cyclone affected people; Australian and Vanuatu officials to better understand the quality received by the public, to get recommendations and suggestions for future interventions in such calamities. Face to face interaction was done to get the feedback from the persons living in cyclone affected areas.
The collected was the response of questionnaires designed. The response was taken in audio format. Respondents of Australia and Vanuatu from both government and private sectors were interviewed. Notes from every interview also collected. Data form Focused group discussion also collected. The data collected after conducting some studies helped to reach the confirmation that the services received by cyclone affected people was satisfying. The collection by DFAT members followed a appropriate method of data collection in both audio format and document format and the results gained at the end of the study proven that the data collected were appropriate.
Nongovernment organisation also participated in this study to gather local public of affected areas for focussed group discussion. NGO’s and other organisations participated in this evaluation were Australian Red Cross, Save the children, Care, Oxfam and World vision. Australian Red Cross, New Zealand Red Cross and French Red Cross assisted around 40000 people and achieved 30% of total emergency services (Cullwick, 2016). They also helped to prioritise identification and strength conclusion of capacity of local society person, recognise discomfort and how cluster meetings has been conducted , they continued to support local people by getting international response, they also helped to provide shelter, food and emergency services.
Care organisation also involved in interventions provided to the affected people, preparing them for cyclone seasons, to find out safe houses for homeless people, food and water (Williams, 2017). Oxfam helped to bring Vanuatu Humanitarian team together, they provided to clear the waste and to provide vouchers to farmers for agricultural needs (Oxfam, 2016). World vision and save the children provided services of food and security programs, they helped to repair and maintain structure of collapsed schools and healthcare services also provided to the cyclone affected (World Vision, 2015).
Criteria used to analyse the actions and achievements of Australia’s intervention program and office of development effectiveness. The main focus of this evaluation was to analyse response of DFAT regarding how the departments led during the time of cyclone, the experts coordinated to each other to deal with adverse situation. This evaluation covered only two initial steps taken by Australian government to provide early recovery and response. The main strategy behind this evaluation was to get feedback and advice from the local residence and government and private officials.
Evaluation has been done on the basis of policy frame work driven at the time of cyclone, especially Humanitarian action policy 2011 and the protection in humanitarian action framework 2013. Humanitarian action policy identifies saving lives and humanitarian and emergency response. This policy saved people and assists them to achieve what they had before the circumstances occurred it also supports Australia’s aid program purpose (Australian Agency for international Development, 2011). Protection in humanitarian action framework supported DFAT to achieve interventions goal it work on a policy of improving safety measures of people faced natural disasters. It also facilitates people by providing funding at the time of non-favourable conditions.
IFRC worked on different strategies (Planning and Evaluation Department, 2011) these are:
DFAT approaches and IFRC, RCS approaches are quite different. DFAT concentrated on initial steps taken by donor, IFRC and RCS approaches concentrate on every aspects of intervention for a long term effect.
World Vision (2018) reported in a report that complete recovery has not achieved yet because most of the structure was damaged and still under process to reach to the goal, more than 50,000 were provided food and around 47000 people received essential household items with the help of other interventions providers like UNICEF, Ministry of Health and world health organisation.
Department of foreign affairs and trade also evaluated the intervention provided by Australian government in health care sectors. They found that the funding provided to the government sector were very effective for fast recovery in health and after seven days of cyclone there was only 2 % requirement for healthcare assistance. According to DFAT evaluation report nearly 39 health facilities has been impaired by the cyclone pam and with the help of local authorities and Australian interventions, 1341 patients has been cured with the help of Vanuatu central hospital. The damaged health facilities have been repaired quickly. Around 9,700 people with health issues were treated by twenty health teams, many people received primary and secondary care, vaccination has been done to save children’s from measles (World Health Organisation, 2016). Twenty Australian medical assistance teams responded quickly to provide health services to the public affected with cyclone (Coates, 2017). It has been evaluated by DFAT that 35000 $ has been sanctioned to Vanuatu government in pharmaceuticals. It was stated in DFAT evaluation article that Australian interventions focused in health sectors properly.
The key findings of DFAT’s evaluation report are:
Conclusion
After studying the whole report and reviewing the articles and reports it can be concluded that the evaluation report published by department of Foreign affairs and trade was based in evidence and appropriate hence it has some lacks. The negative aspects were also discussed by DFAT in that evaluation , they stated that the communication between DFAT and other assistance providers was not enough .the interventions provided by Australian governments and private organisations was rapid and reached to the every person in need, although some of the studies found that the money distributed to the assisting departments were uneven . The methods used in the evaluation report were appropriate and the data collected from the government and private organisation was collected appropriately. It has been also found that some NGO’s were also involved in this study like Care, World vision, save the children etc. Health assistance evaluation also included in this study and has been done by organisations like UNICEF and WHO. Some of the studies found that the assistance provided was not focused on the loss of small businessman’s. It only concentrated on most affected area of Vanuatu. It was also found that study mostly focused on Australia’s initial assistance. Focussed group discussion conducted by DFAT team members to collect the data was appropriate and helpful to understand the need of cyclone affected people. It can also be concluded that in this evaluation report most of the basic need were neglected to evaluate like electricity and roads. Department of Foreign Affairs and trade itself gave them a now rating and stated that the assistance provided to the Vanuatu public was not up to the mark and it was less than expected. The evaluated findings of DFAT’s report were supported by most of the studies supported. Some of the studies or articles criticised the evaluation report but major studies were in favour of the findings concluded by DFAT.
References
Australian Agency for International Development (2011). Humanitarian action policy. Retrieved from: https://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/ausaid-hap-dec-11.pdf
BBC News (2016). Cyclone pam: UN confirms 24 dead and 3,300 displaced in Vanuatu. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-31912305
Bergin, A. (2015). Vanuatu: the aftermath. Retrieved from: https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/vanuatu-the-aftermath/
Care (2016). Does responsive disaster risk reduction make a difference when a category 5 cyclone strikes?. Retrieved from: https://www.care.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Vanuatu-DRR-Impact-Study-Summary_12-Oct-2016.pdf
Coates, S. (2017). Rescue teams reach cyclone- hit Vanuatu islands, official toll lowered. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-weather-vanuatu-cyclone/rescue-teams-reach-cyclone-hit-vanuatu-islands-official-toll-lowered-idUSKBN0MC1ZY20150317
Cullwick, J. (2016). Tropical cyclone pan one year anniversary-Vanuatu Red Cross. Retrieved from: https://dailypost.vu/news/tropical-cyclone-pam-one-year-anniversary-vanuatu-red-cross/article_1d2ba05d-7cd4-5980-9cf2-7e6afd81cd5a.html
Handmer & Iveson (2017). Cyclone pam in Vanuatu: Learning from the low death tolls. Australian journal of emergency management, 32(2), 63-64.
Hayward-Jones, J. (2015). Post cyclone aid to Vanuatu. Retrieved from: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/post-cyclone-aid-vanuatu
Hong, I., Pilarczyk, J. E., Horton, B. P., Fritz, H. M., Kosciuch, T. J., Wallace, D. J., Dike, C., Rarai, A., Harrison, M. J., & Jockley, F. R. (2018). Sedimentological charactersitics of the 2015 tropical cyclone pam over wash sediments from Vanuatu, South pacific. Marine Geology, 396, 2016-214.
Magee, A. D., Verdon-Kidd, D. C., Kiem, A. S., & Royle, S. A. (2016). Tropical cyclone perceptions, impacts and adaptation in the Southwest Pacific: an urban perspective from Fiji, Vanuatu and Tonga. Natural hazards and earth system science, 16(5), 1091-1105.
Ministry for Foreign Affairs (2018). Humanitarian Assistance to Vanuatu. Retrieved from: https://foreignminister.gov.au/releases/Pages/2018/jb_mr_180503a.aspx
Ministry of health Vanuatu (2015). Tropical cyclone pam: Vanuatu. Retrieved from: https://www.wpro.who.int/healthclusterbulletin4.pdf
Morrison & Reid (2015). Vanuatu: cyclone pam, one month on. Retrieved from: https://now.worldvision.org/story/vanuatu-cyclone-pam-one-month
Oxfam (2016). Oxfam in Vanuatu: Cyclone pam response. Retrieved from: https://www.oxfam.org.hk/filemgr/2681/2016ip001cyclonepamoneyearreportfa.pdf
Planning and Evaluation Department (2011). IFRC framework for evaluation. Retrieved from: https://www.ifrc.org/Global/Publications/monitoring/IFRC-Framework-for-Evaluation.pdf
Rey, T., De, L. L., Leone, F., & Gilbert, D. (2017). An integrative approach to understand vulnerability and resilience post-disaster: the 2015 cyclone pam in urban Vanuatu as case study. Disaster prevention and management: an international journal, 26(3), 266.
Shelter cluster (2015). Shelter and settlements vulnerability assessment – final report; cyclone Pam response. Retrieved from: https://www.reachresourcecentre.info/system/files/resource-documents/reach_vut_report_shelter_and_settlements_vulnerability_assessment_after_cyclone_pam_may2015_1.pdf
The Australian (2018). Australia’s cyclone help ‘has not met expectations-DFAT. Retrieved from: https://vanuatuindependent.com/2018/02/22/aus-cyclone-help-not-met-expectations/
UNICEF (2015). Cyclone pam humanitarian situation report 13. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.org/pacificislands/SitRep_13_UNICEF_Pacific_Cyclone_Pam_2_-_3_April_FINAL_(1).pdf
UNICEF (2016). Summary findings: UNICF after action review of cyclone pam. Retrieved from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/unicef_after_action_review_of_cyclone_pam_january_2016_2.pdf
UNOCHA (2015). Flash appeal launched for cyclone-affected Vanuatu. Retrieved from: https://www.unocha.org/story/flash-appeal-launched-cyclone-affected-vanuatu
Williams, N. (2017). Cyclone Donna: Care prepares to respond in Vanuatu. Retrieved from: https://www.care.org.au/media/media-releases/cyclone-donna-care-prepares-respond-vanuatu/
World Health Organisation (2016). Public health risk assessment and interventions, tropical cyclone pam: Vanuatu. Retrieved from: https://iris.wpro.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665.1/13547/9789290617495-eng.pdf
World vision (2018). Cyclone pam update. Retrieved from: https://www.worldvision.org.uk/our-work/emergency-response/vanuatu-cyclone-pam-update/
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality
Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.
We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.
We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.
We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.
We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.