Comparison of the Mentioned Certificates

1. Description that Compares the Mentioned Certificates
2. Whether there are multiple Certification in each organizations and comparing the ones that are most relevant to other certifications
3. Comparing the ones that are most relevant to other certification
4. Comparison of the Agile Tools for Scrum and an inclusion on how they relate to Agile

There exist a number of certifications which are normally awarded to an individual after achieving certain academic qualifications. These qualifications in most cases cover a wide variety of career options (Blankenship et al, 2011).

The major certifications that this task will explore are those of Project Management and Agile Scrum methodologies. The subject includes the following; PMI- ACP, Scrum Alliance (CSM, CPO), Scrum.org and finally that of Safe (Castillo, 2016). These particular certifications play a significant role when it comes to the field of project management and agile scrum methodologies. Researchers have also noted with keen concern, that the certifications in context have many similarities as opposed to the differences that exist among them. This can also be viewed in terms of comparisons and contrasts that may occur in the subject.

With regards to the comparisons that occur among the certification in context, it is realized that employers consider them as new fashion. This forms our first comparison as far as the discussion is concerned. Many employers and companies prefer employing employees who are vast with these certifications since they believe in the certification’s expertise.

 On the same note, the second comparison is on the basis that there is an undertaking of examinations for one to be awarded the certifications. For example, both the certification of PMI- ACP and Scrum.org has been debated by great intellectuals from the field of project management and agile scrum methodologies to offer great examinations. The examinations are reffered to as great because the concept or ideas are precisely presented. Other than there precise nature, they also take note of professionalism which ensures that an individual with these certifications is competent (Cobb, 2011).

In continuation, Scrum Alliance (CSM, CPO) and Safe are also argued to be amongst the group of the most famous certification. They also apply the concept of examination just like the mentioned two in the previous sentences. The only contrast that they offer is on the examination methodology but that does not overrule the exam similarity (Goldstein, 2014). For the two, there is an administration of a standard course and then an exam is given as the final assessment. There exams usually seem to be very easy but critics have advised against this fact, they argue that, in most cases those exams are usually tricky and may not be easy to pass.

Certifications in Organizations and Choosing the Most Relevant

The final comparison is on the issue of finance of the certification. Not even a single of the mentioned certification is offered for free. All of them are usually paid for. There may only be a slight contrast on how much is paid for each but all are paid for. Going back to the certification of PMI- ACP, it is regarded as one of the most expensive certification. An amount of about $ 400 to $ 450 is paid for it. Apart from it, there is also the Scrum Alliance (CSM, CPO) which charges almost at the same level as the latter. Among the four certifications in question, it is only that of Scrum.org that charges a fair fee of around $ 130 to $ 180. The fact still remains unaltered that they share a great comparison in that all of them are offered at a fee and none is offered for free (Moreira, 2013).

It is arguable that there are chances of an existence of more than one certification in an organization. In some, cases certifications may exist as multiple. A concept that has been greatly discouraged by a number of experts for the reason that every certification has got it’s on specialized areas and may not easily interchange with one other or may not correlate well to an organization (Rubin, 2012).

The certifications which can exist as multiple to an individual organization include those of scrum alliance and scrum.org. The two are argued to be similar since in both, one can easily manage to pass the exams administered for them. Since srum.org is not very expensive, it can be easy for an individual to combine it with scrum agile which is quite expensive. Most organizations therefore prefer picking a number of employees with the certifications in question to improve for the organizational output. It is out of these concept that it is conclude that both scrum.org and scrum agile certification can exist in one organization (Sutherland, 2014).

Nevertheless, among the two certifications in context, Scrum agile certification is also seen as having great comparisons with other certifications that have not been mentioned previously in the subsequent paragraphs but are within the scope of project management and agile scrum methodologies. The other certification that compares with this certification is that of DSDM foundation and practitioner. This is majorly argued as mentioned because they both originate from agile methodologies and DSDM Atern.

Comparison of Relevant Certifications

There exist a great number of the agile tools for scrum which plays a vital role to the life of a project manager. These agile tools include the following; rally, scrimmage, pivotal tracker, yodiz and ax soft among others (SWQD et al, 2015). For the purpose of the question in context, we will only dwell on four of these tools and their comparisons, and even the role that they offer to the agile project manager. The first discussion will be on pivotal tracker.

Pivotal tracker

It is regarded as a tool of the agile for scrum with the view of group priorities. This is because it offers much collaborations and analyses organizational progress.  It compares with other tools because like the rest; it depends upon them for great organizational output. All the agile tools for scrum mainly prioritize on organizational improvement, so is pivotal tracker. This tool is also important to a project manager since it assist the manager in making analysis of the overall organizational progress. The second tool is on Atlassian (Schwaber, 2009).

Atlassian

The subject agile tool for scrum compares with other tools since it supports agile methodologies. It does not offer discrimination to any of the methodologies, be it scrum, kanban or any of a unique flavor. This tool is important to the project manager since it offers wide variety of concepts that acts as pillar stones to methodologies used in organizational management. The third tool is on Yodiz.

Yodiz

The particular agile tool for scrum in question is known for supporting the management of product backlog. It brings on board teamwork that is vital to organizational management. The tool compares with other tools because it also offers assistance to organizational pillars just like those of Atlassian among others. It is also important to a project manager because it natures to the manager the importance of teamwork as a way of managing management of an organization. The final agile tool for scrum with regards to the question is that of scrumwise.

Scrumwise

This tool is regarded as the easiest and also fastest agile tool for scrum. It is usually enjoyable when put into practice. Scrumwise as an agile tool and also compares greatly with other tools, the comparison comes in the context where, it also helps in organizational backlog management and even realizing planning (Webb, 2015). These are key concerns that have been noted in other discussed previous tools like Yodiz. Finally, the tool is important to the project manager since it equips the managers with the necessary knowledge backlog management and planning realizations.

References

Blankenship, J., Bussa, M., Millett, S., Lewis, R., & Foggon, D. (2011). Pro Agile .NET development with Scrum. New York: Apress.

Castillo, F. (2016). Managing Information Technology.

Cobb, C. G. (2011). Making sense of agile project management: Balancing control and agility. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Goldstein, I. (2014). Scrum shortcuts without cutting corners: Agile tactics, tools & tips.

Moreira, M. E. (2013). Being agile: Your roadmap to successful adoption of agile. New York: Apress. Pham, A., & Pham, P.-V. (2012). Scrum in action: Agile software project management and development. Boston, MA: Course Technology.

Rubin, K. S. (2012). Essential Scrum: A practical guide to the most popular agile process. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.

Schwaber, K. (2009). Agile Project Management with Scrum. New York: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Sutherland, J. V. (2014). Scrum: The art of doing twice the work in half the time. New York: Crown Business.

SWQD (Conference), In Winkler, D., In Biffl, S., & In Bergsmann, J. (2015). Software quality: The future of systems- and software development : 8th International Conference, SWQD 2016, Vienna, Austria, January 18-21, 2016, Proceedings.

Webb, A. (2015). Agile Project Management Methodology for Beginners: Scrum Project Management for Beginners.